<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--Generated by Squarespace Site Server v5.11.81 (http://www.squarespace.com/) on Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:54:15 GMT--><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/universal/styles/feed.css"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>In the Process ~ A Blog by Firehaus Studio - Comments</title><link>http://www.firehausstudio.com/in-the-process/</link><description></description><copyright></copyright><language>en-US</language><generator>Squarespace Site Server v5.11.81 (http://www.squarespace.com/)</generator><item><title>Matthew Cornell comments on 2010 Webby Awards: Explore Thomas Cole website is an Official Honoree</title><author>Matthew Cornell</author><pubDate>Sun, 18 Apr 2010 18:13:05 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.firehausstudio.com/in-the-process/2010/4/15/2010-webby-awards-explore-thomas-cole-website-is-an-official.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">310435:3769424:comment/8087725</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>Wow!! A big congratulations, all.</p>]]></description></item><item><title>djs comments on Emotion Products for Consumers, Tool Products for Business</title><author>djs</author><pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 14:54:18 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.firehausstudio.com/in-the-process/2009/2/23/emotion-products-for-consumers-tool-products-for-business.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">310435:3769424:comment/7718114</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>IMO This is the whole crux of the Apple iMac versus Windows PC debate.  And since modern generations don't mind learning multiple User Interfaces - they don't mind having a different computing platform for these two modes.</p>]]></description></item><item><title>djs comments on A 2x2 on Skill and Philosophy</title><author>djs</author><pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 14:22:05 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.firehausstudio.com/in-the-process/2009/5/1/a-2x2-on-skill-and-philosophy.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">310435:3769424:comment/7717880</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>Hmmmm.... Thinking &quot;Low Skill&quot; and &quot;Low Philosophy&quot; would result in a broader applicability.  It is true that a child may have no skill and no philosophy - but there are adults who possess and/or even prefer &quot;low skill&quot; and &quot;low philosophy&quot; perspectives.</p>]]></description></item><item><title>Matthew Cornell comments on Natural Beauty; a Visit to the Smith College Arboretum</title><author>Matthew Cornell</author><pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 15:26:35 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.firehausstudio.com/in-the-process/2010/1/21/natural-beauty-a-visit-to-the-smith-college-arboretum.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">310435:3769424:comment/7492543</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>Beautiful! Important to include beauty in our lives.</p>]]></description></item><item><title>Matthew Cornell comments on Question Driven Process (QDP): A New Roadmap for Website Development</title><author>Matthew Cornell</author><pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 17:11:12 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.firehausstudio.com/in-the-process/2010/1/14/question-driven-process-qdp-a-new-roadmap-for-website-develo.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">310435:3769424:comment/7095844</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>Very, very good post, Liza.</p>]]></description></item><item><title>Liza comments on Beautiful Process, Beautiful Product; the Emotional Response to Design Patterns</title><author>Liza</author><pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 19:11:17 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.firehausstudio.com/in-the-process/2009/12/4/beautiful-process-beautiful-product-the-emotional-response-t.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">310435:3769424:comment/6784725</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>Matt, you raise an interesting point about natural vs. man-made beauty.  In nature there is no control, it simply is.  Randomness is part of nature. </p><p>When man intervenes, the composition changes and man's flaws are highlighted. Man's ability or inability to see affects the outcome.  But nothing is random in man's creation; it is either broken or not.</p>]]></description></item><item><title>Matthew Cornell comments on Beautiful Process, Beautiful Product; the Emotional Response to Design Patterns</title><author>Matthew Cornell</author><pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 14:48:55 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.firehausstudio.com/in-the-process/2009/12/4/beautiful-process-beautiful-product-the-emotional-response-t.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">310435:3769424:comment/6652984</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>Great insight re: beauty, process, and product. A variation on form following function? Re patterns, I agree - I know little, but it's clear our brains crave order. Does order mean saftey, I wonder... Also, when is disorder or randomness pleasing. I'm thinking of when I stood outside a few weeks ago on one of those days when ice on branches was melting, and the sun was shining just perfectly, causing millions of scintillating diamonds in every color imaginable. I was stopped dead in my tracks, it was so beautiful. And completely random. Similar to leaves' shadows in a gentle wind in the fall?</p><p>Great stuff, Liza.</p>]]></description></item><item><title>Liza comments on Is success a repeatable process?</title><author>Liza</author><pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 20:11:14 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.firehausstudio.com/in-the-process/2009/5/20/is-success-a-repeatable-process.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">310435:3769424:comment/4870307</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely, people creating a Non-Repeatable process are visionaries or trendsetters.  There will be a small percent of people who travel this path and stay on it.</p>]]></description></item><item><title>Matthew Cornell comments on Is success a repeatable process?</title><author>Matthew Cornell</author><pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 20:06:10 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.firehausstudio.com/in-the-process/2009/5/20/is-success-a-repeatable-process.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">310435:3769424:comment/4870292</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>Non-repeatable processes represent a significant barrier to entry, no? They're also *costly* in terms of thinking and time.</p>]]></description></item><item><title>Liza comments on Is success a repeatable process?</title><author>Liza</author><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 18:05:33 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.firehausstudio.com/in-the-process/2009/5/20/is-success-a-repeatable-process.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">310435:3769424:comment/4856865</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for noting the task/process split.  </p><p>Here is the parallel in GTD terms:</p><p>Non-Repeatable Task would be a &quot;Single Action&quot;<br/>Repeatable Task would be a Project (containing a series of Next Actions).</p><p>Repeatable and Non-Repeatable Process contain a series of a Projects.  For Repeatable Process, you know what you are doing which means you have a clear sequence of next actions. With Non-Repeatable Process you are learning, creating the roadmap, so you are defining the next actions.</p>]]></description></item><item><title>Matthew Cornell comments on Is success a repeatable process?</title><author>Matthew Cornell</author><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 17:35:37 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.firehausstudio.com/in-the-process/2009/5/20/is-success-a-repeatable-process.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">310435:3769424:comment/4856760</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>Very stimulating post, Liza. I agree completely that most self-help success stories are non-repeatable. I'll think more about Skill versus Philosophy. I admit I'm having trouble getting my head around the task/process split. Let's talk!</p>]]></description></item><item><title>Liza Bouchard comments on Brainstorming is Half the Journey</title><author>Liza Bouchard</author><pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 16:54:13 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.firehausstudio.com/in-the-process/2009/5/11/brainstorming-is-half-the-journey.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">310435:3769424:comment/4015841</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>Matt, yes a great point, the convergence/divergence process seems nonlinear, and never in a static place.  Awareness is a very important part, yes!</p>]]></description></item><item><title>Matthew Cornell comments on Brainstorming is Half the Journey</title><author>Matthew Cornell</author><pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 02:24:43 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.firehausstudio.com/in-the-process/2009/5/11/brainstorming-is-half-the-journey.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">310435:3769424:comment/4013062</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>Great conversation. One aspect I'm thinking about is awareness (knowing which phase you're in) and heuristics for knowing when to move from one/to the other. Also, we need a nonlinear description - journeys, paths, etc. Cycles?</p>]]></description></item><item><title>Matthew Cornell comments on A 2x2 on Skill and Philosophy</title><author>Matthew Cornell</author><pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 15:00:30 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.firehausstudio.com/in-the-process/2009/5/1/a-2x2-on-skill-and-philosophy.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">310435:3769424:comment/3937148</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>Nice! I had Style vs. Talent and Joy vs. Talent, but yours is deeper.</p>]]></description></item><item><title>Matthew Cornell comments on My New Food Journal</title><author>Matthew Cornell</author><pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 21:05:29 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.firehausstudio.com/in-the-process/2009/1/20/my-new-food-journal.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">310435:3769424:comment/3905010</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>I love the power of pure observation - large potential for creating behavior changes, simply by recording. And paper is great!</p>]]></description></item></channel></rss>
